I'll never get over this Amanda Knox nonsense. Forget that there's no DNA, no evidence, no reason to believe she killed her roommate, Meredith Kercher. Then forget that this prosecutor is a nut who has accused others of murder without a shred of evidence and, in one case, without the person even being in the country. Now let's talk motive. The theory is that Amanda and her handsome boyfriend, Raffaele Sollecito, who could join any orgy in Perugia, were so eager to have a sex-out with this homeless, and probably dirty African-American street person, Rudy Guede, that when Meredith refused to join in they killed her out of a fit of pique. Boy there's an iron-clad case. Here's my theory. Street person Rudy knew other people in the house. He was liked and used to using their apartment for his convenience. They were not home and he really had to go. It was vacation time and Meredith, another tenant, was the only person home. Can I use you toilet, please, please. Being a kind girl she says yes. When he was finished, he didn't flush (there was unflushed feces in the toilet). Why? Because he didn't want her to know he was finished; that way he could sneak up on her and kill her. Which is why his was the only DNA at the murder scene, and why he immediately tried to escape to Germany. The stupid Italians ignored all this damning evidence and gave Guede a very-light-for-murder sentence of 16 years and devoted all their energies to pursuing the innocent Amanda and Raffaele. Mama Mia!
Note: Since 2009, I have noticed an odd kind of worldwide mental abberation via those posting on the interenet. An angry, bitter, assuredness—mostly among woman—that Amanda Knox is guilty and a cold-hearted killer despite all evidence to the contrary. I think this fury speaks more about the neurosis of these people than about Ms. Knox or this case.
No comments:
Post a Comment