Why do I suspect that every time there is a act of terrorism in the world or the United States, Donald Trump is gleeful? This is not a man who fears chaos, rebellion and suffering; he welcomes it. I don't think the human toll is nearly as important to him as any kind of evidence that he was correct in a dire prediction. Of course dire predictions are easy as there will always be problems in the world. Optimism is a whole lot harder, and there is probably more evidence of it every day than disaster. It's just that the lazy, incompetent media doesn't report it. In the same way that they under-report Hillary Clinton's positive speeches, while they over-report every nasty word out of Trump's mouth, whether it's true or not. Look at the amount of time they gave to the savage conventioneers, irrationally asking for Clinton to be jailed. Hillary doesn't get nearly as much coverage, nor do the networks cluck, cluck at the insanity of such demands. Sadly the liberal media panders to Donald Trump as much as the conservative media. I don't why. I'm guessing it's because they're afraid of him. Which would explain George Stephanopolous and David Muir caving into Trump two nights ago when he spun his absurd tale of a speech-writing staffer.
No comments:
Post a Comment