Friday, March 30, 2012
Do you know what acid reflux feels like?
This complaint isn't so much about the commercials as the product. I feel certain that one of these days there will be a special bulletin about how dangerous this drink is. When I was in Boston this winter, they were handing them out on the street. The young lady gave me two. After just one, I didn't feel a surge of energy, just a major case of heartburn which lasted two full days. Later in the trip, I stupidly took the other bottle, assuming that that first attack was just a coincidence. But no, miserable again. I would say it's just me but other friends have complained of heartburn, headaches, and just the opposite of this elixirs intended use:lethargy. Mark my words, these so-called energy drinks are in for a speedy recall one of these days.
Road House (1948) - Ida Lupino singing "One For My Baby"
Why did I include this? Because I like it so damn much. Because singers with great voices aren't always the best choice to put across a song. The Ida Lupino version of The Harold Arlen/Johnny Mercer song, "One for my Baby" is considered one of the greatest singing scenes in movie history. That's pretty high praise for a song that's been sung by all the most famous singers, including Frank Sinatra, Perry Como, Tony Bennett, Frankie Laine, Fred Astaire and even Marlene Dietrich. But then as Celest Holm says about Ida in this classic film noir, "She does more without a voice than anyone I've ever heard."
Labels:
"One for My Baby",
Ida Lupino,
Road House
A family of frauds

Thursday, March 29, 2012
Andy, you were so right.
"In the future everyone will be famous for fifteen minutes." Andy Warhol
While there are many versions of that Andy Warhol quote, it has certain proven true, if not for everyone then for many more people than we ever imagined. The fame comes from being a contestant on a quiz show, committing a crime, being the victim of a crime, doing something disgusting or detestable, pretending your child visited heaven, or putting a home video on the internet and gaining instant attention. But I wonder if Andy realized how rapidly the lazy media would accommodate those pathetic unknowns seeking their brief time in the spotlight. In the case of the home videos, instantly accepting that they are absolutely genuine, thus catapulting persons involved to temporary fame, even if they actually staged the whole thing. I'm aware of this from an ABC news story right now about a baby biting the finger of a tot and him screaming in pain. This video has, as they say, gone viral. Yet to me, whether it is or not, this seems so incredibly staged and fake that I amazed that so many people find it charming and real. But then almost everything on America's Funniest Videos are obviously faked. It seems the American public doesn't mind being duped as long as they're amused or aren't clever enough to spot the deception. One could ask, why was the camera there at that significant moment in so many cases? Why? Because it was staged, faked, rehearsed, planned. While I don't find these fakeries offensive in themselves, I am offended that the American public is so gullible and that the broadcast news media is so easily deceived and so unwilling to do difficult reporting it will add any trivial video to the nightly news.
While there are many versions of that Andy Warhol quote, it has certain proven true, if not for everyone then for many more people than we ever imagined. The fame comes from being a contestant on a quiz show, committing a crime, being the victim of a crime, doing something disgusting or detestable, pretending your child visited heaven, or putting a home video on the internet and gaining instant attention. But I wonder if Andy realized how rapidly the lazy media would accommodate those pathetic unknowns seeking their brief time in the spotlight. In the case of the home videos, instantly accepting that they are absolutely genuine, thus catapulting persons involved to temporary fame, even if they actually staged the whole thing. I'm aware of this from an ABC news story right now about a baby biting the finger of a tot and him screaming in pain. This video has, as they say, gone viral. Yet to me, whether it is or not, this seems so incredibly staged and fake that I amazed that so many people find it charming and real. But then almost everything on America's Funniest Videos are obviously faked. It seems the American public doesn't mind being duped as long as they're amused or aren't clever enough to spot the deception. One could ask, why was the camera there at that significant moment in so many cases? Why? Because it was staged, faked, rehearsed, planned. While I don't find these fakeries offensive in themselves, I am offended that the American public is so gullible and that the broadcast news media is so easily deceived and so unwilling to do difficult reporting it will add any trivial video to the nightly news.
I think my password was $#%%$$@##@@##!

Sunday, March 25, 2012
Not that anyone cares, but....

It's alive! It's stil alive!

Dick Cheney has a new heart. (Hard to believe he had an old one.) And I am appalled at the number of posters on HuffPost and elsewhere who wish him well and call him a patriot. Since I doubt any news outlet will print my comments, I think I'll put them here.
Since Cheney is 71, I suspect that some younger person is going without a new heart because Cheney jumped the line even though he claims to have waited 20 months.
Even he doesn't reject this new heart, I can only hope he is going through a great deal of pain and discomfort, vomiting constantly from the anti-rejection medication, being fed only through tubes, and living with the constant fear that it will stop working at any given moment.
I hope some columnist has the courage to remind everyone of the thousands of men, women and children who were killed, maimed, crippled, blinded and made homeless because this raging, aging asshole couldn't be happy without having a war.
I hope his echoing daughter and icy wife are either suffering by seeing him in this helpless state, or bored to death by coming to the hospital and pretending they still like this old fool.
I hope all over America families who have been patiently waiting for a heart to become available for their child or too-young-to-die relative ask why this aging, feeble old fool managed to get a heart transplant while they are still on the waiting list. And I hope one of those persons is a maniacal aunt who secretly has offed other geriatric patients for minor offenses and just happens to be the nurse assigned to watch over Mr. Cheney.
I hope the authorities were wise enough to take his old heart, sprinkle it with holy water, encase it in 8 feet of cement and
bury it deep in some rarely visited desert.
And finally I hope to soon see the headline on HuffPost and other sites: CHENEY DEAD.
Note: The National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute in listing those who are eligible for a heart transplant has this as the first bullet on their list of what's a person ineligible for a transplant:
Advanced age. There is no widely accepted upper age limit for a heart transplant. However, most transplant surgeries are done on patients younger than 70 years old.
Saturday, March 24, 2012
Not a good case for Ally.
This is a stupid commercial for several reasons. One they didn't tell us what they actually told these "total strangers". Two, if they knew the suitcase held $100,000, they certainly would suspect a Candid Camera type setup. And three, though I know it's an expression, "they didn't take a dime" was bad writing since a suitcase full of paper money wouldn't have a dime. Why not, "They didn't take a single bill"? Also they call it the suitcase commercial. I would say that this is an attache case or a brief case, hardly a suitcase. This is the bank that did those wonderful commercials with children a year or two back. Did Ally change agencies or just get a less creative team?
Note: Days after I posted this, a good friend in Boston sent me a news article that Ally did indeed change agencies from the highly imaginative Bartle Bogle Hegerty to the very gray Grey.
Note: Days after I posted this, a good friend in Boston sent me a news article that Ally did indeed change agencies from the highly imaginative Bartle Bogle Hegerty to the very gray Grey.
Friday, March 23, 2012
Pigging out.
The first Maxwell the pig commercial was charming, hilarious,and innovative. People loved it. But just because people love something doesn't mean they want more of the same. I'm sure there are many people that enjoy these commercials, but I think they diminish the value of the original. Maxwell is not doing anything significantly different; he's just wee-wee-weeing in different settings. Sorry, Max, I'm no longer amused.
Does grapefruit juice give you the power to fly?
I think these commercials are nothing short of idiotic. When the first ones appeared it was very clever because it involved real situations, then suddenly it became a tableful of prognosticators. What is this a town of witches and warlocks? And what are all these people doing have breakfast together anyway. But even if it weren't stupid, I absolutely detest commercials that suggest the product has magical qualities. It's orange juice! The juice of an orange. Having a glass doesn't make your day any easier, your temper less short, your patience extended. Who comes up with this idiocy? Especially when pure orange juice tastes delicious and has vitamins. Why not create a commercial that cleverlysays that instead of coming up with these absurd scenarios?
Sunday, March 18, 2012
Many roads lead to ancient Rome.


Television has gotten so bad that with a few exceptions, like Boardwalk and Revenge,and Mad Men, the most entertaining dramatic series of the week is Alfred Hitchcock Presents from the 1960s: hour-long black and white mysteries with real actors in real stories with real plots—and no commercials since they are on Encore. I'm sure there are other series that are on that are of some value, but I won't find them because I refuse to sit through ten minutes of show followed by 5-8 minutes of commercials. Anyway this week I found the perfect example of the quality television of the past and the crap they pawn off as entertainment today: Spartacus versus I, Claudius. True I,Claudius was a limited series based on two classic novels by Robert Graves I, Claudius (1934) and Claudius the God (1935) while Spartacus, is an open-ended series loosely based on Spartacus a gladiator and escaped slave in ancient Rome who led the Third Servile War in 73 BC. But while IC was brilliantly written, deftly plotted and actually had well-defined characters, it clearly was written for an adult audience. One anticipated each new chapter because you never knew what would happen next. Spartacus, on the other hand, is a series of short scenes followed by incredibly bloody slaughters, cliched characters, laughable pseudo-classical dialog, lot of nudity and was obviously written for bloodthirsty pre-teens who also wanted see "titties" or a gay audience since it is the first show I know of to show so much frontal male nudity. (Apparently in ancient Rome every man, including slaves had fabulous bodies with great pecs. Yet despite the city's many baths they were always dirty and sweaty.) Despite each show's different chapter name, I suspect it's, in essence, the same show every week. Now I am a person who completely approves of porn, which is basically what this show is, however soft. But there are lots of porn sites on the Internet so I really wish somebody would write a tv series for grownup with scenes that last longer than 30 seconds. But until then I will content myself with Alfred Hitchcock Presents. Not that I don't wish Spartacus enormous success. I do. If only because it will drive Santorum insane to know that this much nudity and sex is being shown for almost an hour every week.
Saturday, March 17, 2012
Two potential candidates?

Wednesday, March 14, 2012
Speaking Truth to Power
As an atheist, I am always astonished at the lack of Christianity among Christians. But every now and then you find a minister, priest or other religious leader who restores your faith that some clergy can make a difference. This is one of those times.
Labels:
Missouri,
Speaking Truth to Power,
Springfield
Monday, March 12, 2012
English battles one cannot win.

Saturday, March 10, 2012
More than anyone knows.

Thursday, March 8, 2012
"Deedle-dee-dee-dee-DEE, two ladies..."

Wednesday, March 7, 2012
Karen, we hardly knew ye.

Tuesday, March 6, 2012
Come out of that closet, guys!

It's interesting how many pretty boys or ex pretty boys become so anti-homosexual. Especially those who seem suspiciously less than masculine. It seems to me it takes a certain kind of obsession to a cause to spend so much effort and thought on it. I, being gay, I have no animosity toward women, and greatly admire those that are witty, talented and beautiful. Why should I hate them? They pose no threat to me. But gay-haters like Kirk Camera, Tony Perkins and Tucker Carlson are threatened. Why? Because the Bible tells them that homosexuality is evil? Not likely. Since they can't seem to come up with any biblical proof of such a statement. Even if they dig up the old Sodom and Gomorrah story, it isn't all that clear. No the fight they are having is in themselves. I am sure when Kirk was an adorable young star, he got propositioned a lot. Maybe he even succumbed and spent his nights crying at his sinfulness. Now he must vilify the very thing that so attracts him. Poor Kirk. More and more Americans are accepting the idea of gay marriages. Why? Because they are comfortable in their heterosexual identities. They are not threatened. Show me a straight man who has an intense hatred of homosexuals and I'll show you a man with a copy of Stallion hidden somewhere in his home.
Monday, March 5, 2012
A film to see, and a film to shun.

Almost perfect.
This is one of my favorite gripes. These commercials for Charles Schwab are quite good. The spokesman they chose is also very good. Except for one thing. I cannot understand why someone who makes a living out of being a spokesman doesn't have outstanding English. This man, in particular, must be making a fortune out of being the spokesman for Schwab (a company I found to be very cool when I approached them as my portfolio did not meet their high standards. But no matter.) You will note in this spot he says,"...even if they are not ours...". Actually he doesn't say "ours". Like so many lazy speakers of the language, he says, "ares". This man's makes his living out of speaking English. Wouldn't you think he would know the difference between "ours" and "ares"?
If it were only true.
I think Campbell's was very smart to come up with this campaign. Of course it's a total lie. I mean let's face it, unless you're ordering some spectacular bisque or chef-designed recipe in an expensive restaurant, there is nothing exciting about soup, notably Campbell's soup. So when they say, "It's amazing what soup can do" I don't really know what they mean. I would say that Campbell's Tomato Soup is acceptable once a year; Chicken Noodle twice; and New England Clam Chowder never because it's almost all potatoes.There's nothing amazing about any Campbell's soup I ever had, and I never expressed the kind of irrepressible joy that so many of the consumers on their commercials seem to feel. But I must admit the commercials are well done, very nearly convincing and make me want to try Campbell's Soup again, but I know it will be just as acceptable, pedestrian and unamazing as it was the last time. Besides I miss the Campbell Kids. They were more honest.
Saturday, March 3, 2012
Stout-hearted men?

Let Us Now Damn Famous Men

Note: If you want to see what Shirley Sherron, the woman he vilified, said about Breitbart's death, along with lots of other brilliantly explored political news go to My Cats are Democrats
Friday, March 2, 2012
A giant step backward.
I really detest this Chase commercial for lots of reasons. One is, of course, that it's totally absurd, some jock copywriter's fantasy of what he wishes his young son could do. But even accepting it as reality, this child has caused neighborhood-wide destruction. He's destroyed people's homes, ruined their days, and frightened them. The sponsor suggests that sending people a check makes everything all right. They apparently are not taking taking into account that you have find and hire a glazier or plasterer or whatever. And most annoying is that old sports cliche that the smug father doesn't care what kind of destruction his son causes as long as he's good as sport. The whole message of this commercial seems to be "money fixes everything". And despite being one of America's leading banks, Chase obviously doesn't understand that it doesn't. Pity that so many people think that destruction is funny.
Rushing to unhappiness.

Thursday, March 1, 2012
It's not that difficult to say it right.

Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)