It's obvious to me that all three networks are out to vilify Hillary Clinton. But what is their game plan? By constantly claiming(falsely, I believe) that she is an unpopular, greedy and larcenous liar and cheat are they hoping to cost her the election? Is there a reason they feel that Donald Trump would be a better president than Hillary? Is their goal to cost her so many votes Trump will win the election? If not, why are they working so hard and so deceptively to defeat her, or at least make her an unwelcome commander in chief even if she wins. And why does the media constantly attack her with such authority when the subjects of the e-mails are top secret, something they don't even know much about? And while attacking her, why do they keep backtracking on Trump? For instance calling him presidential when he was in Mexico, but soft-pedaling his obscene and angry rant back home in Arizona? Further why does the media attack The Clinton Foundation for a supposed lack of oversight, yet give so meager coverage to the amazing work the Foundation does in relieving so much sickness and misery in the world? They act is if the Clintons are like Scrooge McDuck piling up gold coins in a hidden storeroom. And why do many supposed unbiased reporters (like Steve Kornacki) seem so vengeful and gleeful when they are reporting what they believe to be the latest Clinton sin? There's a mystery here, and a vendetta, and an end game. And it's very concerning.
No comments:
Post a Comment