EVERYBODY'S ONLY HOPE.

I am getting so tired of hearing people say in that apologetic tone of voice, "I don't really like Hillary Clinton."  First of all I suspect that they don't have all the facts and have fallen prey to Republican propaganda. But even if that weren't the case, my advice is, "Get over it!" Stop repeating that you don't like or don't trust Hillary Clinton, because she is the only person in the world that can protect you, your family and your future from the dangerous and catastrophic presidency of Donald Trump. No matter how often the news tries to redeem him, and says idiotic comments like, "He's pivoted and seems more presidential now" the man is your worst nightmare. Donald Trump is a liar, a bigot, a homophobe, a xenophobe, a grifter, a Russophile, a narcissist, and a megalomaniac. Worse that even that he's an serial loser who hasn't got a clue how to govern our country. So keep whining about how you don't trust Hillary, carp about those e-mails even you don't understand, keep bleating about  Benghazi, moan about Monica, and plan on living under a Trump presidency where any security you had will soon disappear. Or start recognizing all the good Hillary has done, the difference she's made in the world, the experience she has gained over the decades, and take comfort in having a president who will enrich your life because she knows what the hell she is doing.

We all know that Donald Trump is a pathological liar. Sadly some of America's dumbest people believe most of those lies. But one I have been questioning lately is that he says his wife was a top fashion model. True she does have a nice body. But to be a fashion model, don't you have to have eyes?

GUESS WHO DOESN'T OWN A DALMATION COAT?

It's obvious to me that all three networks are out to vilify Hillary Clinton. But  what is their game plan? By constantly claiming(falsely, I believe)  that she is an unpopular, greedy and larcenous liar and cheat are they hoping to cost her the election? Is there a reason they feel that Donald Trump would be a better  president than Hillary? Is their goal to cost her so many votes Trump will win the election?  If not, why are they working so hard and so deceptively to defeat her, or at least make her an unwelcome commander in chief even if she wins.  And why does the media constantly attack her with such authority when the subjects of the e-mails are top secret, something they don't even know much about? And while attacking her, why do they keep backtracking on Trump? For instance calling him presidential when he was in Mexico, but soft-pedaling his obscene and angry rant back home in Arizona? Further why does the media attack The Clinton Foundation for a supposed lack of oversight, yet give so meager coverage to the amazing work the Foundation does in relieving so much sickness and misery in the world? They act is if the Clintons are like Scrooge McDuck piling up gold coins in a hidden storeroom. And why do many supposed unbiased reporters (like Steve Kornacki) seem so vengeful and gleeful when they are reporting what they believe to be the latest Clinton sin? There's a mystery here, and a vendetta, and an end game. And it's very concerning.

A PLACE YOU SHOULD GO, AND OFTEN.

If you have a high tolerance for hilarious vulgarity and a low tolerance for media distortions and outright lies, and invented Republican scandals, and two-faced politicians you should be a regular reader of the blog below. Because not only is the Rude Pundit brilliant and trenchant and honest, but he is the only pundit I can find who comments fairly on the good that Hillary Clinton does in the world and points out, as I try to, how unfairly she is treated by the lazy, ratings-crazy media. So anytime you need a dose of reality, along with a huge helping of sexual imagery, scatology, and righteous anger, read his blog. This is a writer who will take no shit from the media or crooked politicians or the great orangutan Trump, and always delivers his posts with fairness and well-reasoned logic. Read him. Your brain will thank you for it.
           http://rudepundit.blogspot.com/
Note: I am not including a photo or name because I think, despite some publicity, the Rude Pundit still prefers anonymity.

If you have a high tolerance for hilarious vulgarity and a low tolerance for media distortions and outright lies and two-faced politicians you should be a regular reader of the blog below. Because not only is the Rude Pundit brilliant and trenchant and honest, but he is the only pundit I can find who comments on the good that Hillary Clinton does in the world and points out, as I try to, and how unfairly she is treated by the lazy, ratings-crazy media. So anytime you need a dose of reality, along with a huge helping of sexual imagery, scatology, and righteous anger, read his blog. This is a writer who will take no shit from the media or crooked politicians or the great orangutan Trump, but still delivers his posts with fairness and well-reasoned logic. Read him. Your brain will thank you for it.

http://rudepundit.blogspot.com/

NOT ALWAYS THE ANSWER.

What do these famous celebrities have in common: Marlon Brando, Al Pacino, Mark Wahlberg, John Travolta, Wolfgang Puck, Walt Disney, Nicholas Gage, Ryan Gosling, and Marilyn Monroe to name just  few?  Surprisingly it's the same thing that these billionaires have in common: Richard Branson, David Murdoch, James Clark, David Karp, Joe Lewis, and Mike Hudack to name a few more. The answer? None of them graduated from high school. I post this because I didn't graduate from high school and have had a very successful career in advertising. And I still think only unimaginative companies still demand a college degree as a must-have hiring necessity.  I recently, having become bored with retirement, decided to apply my talents to some local ad agency for far less than I was previously paid, and was surprised that the ones I saw listed all required a college degree. This is especially amusing when I recall all the creative people from my past with college degrees who were completely sans ideas. You've either got it or you ain't.

HOW DONALD SEES MEXICO.

Gee, with all those murderers streaming across the Mexican border, why isn't Trump worried? He's told us time and again how dangerous these criminals are to the decent, god-fearing, always law abiding, lily white citizens of our border states. He has bravely and staunchly offended and incited this mob of ruthless killers and nasty rabble rousers. How difficult would it be for one mustachioed assassin to slip away from the marauding crowd during one of their murderous town-burning sprees and seek him out? Unless, of course, he was lying about all these invasive villains, and not only are there not that many border crossers, but they'll just well-meaning, hard-working, ordinary people looking for a better life for themselves and their children. But would Donald lie about that? Would he lie about anything?